After a 90+ minute delay in announcing the results (due to problems with the Diebold machines counting the ballots), the results are in for the Ames Straw Poll:
1. Mitt Romney - 4516 votes, 31.5%
2. Mike Huckabee - 2587, 18.1%
3. Sam Brownback - 2192, 15.3%
4. Tom Tancredo - 1,961, 13.7%
5. Ron Paul - 1305, 9.1%
6. Tommy Thompson - 1039, 7.3%
7. Fred Thompson - 203, 1.4%
8. Rudy Giuliani - 183, 1.3%
9. Duncan Hunter - 174, 1.2%
10. John McCain - 101, 1%
11. John Cox - 41, .1%
Total Votes: 14,302
As expected, Romney won...and even though his percentage was about the same as GWBush in 1999, the difference between first and second was greater than Bush's victory over Steve Forbes eight years ago. Since he did just as good as Bush did, Romney can probably sleep well tonight knowing that he met the expectations that were out there.
In a surprise to many (but not, ahem, the FCPolitico), Mike Huckabee finished second. Since the first Republican debate, I have been impressed with him. His message really must have resonated with the Iowa voters because he did not have the money to spend (like Romney), and did not make this a make-or-break event (like Tommy Thompson). We'll see if this translates into more resources headed Huckabee's way.
Brownback and Tancredo did better than I expected, but it is a testament to the importance (and money) they threw at today's event. They were second only to Romney in the number of supporters being transported to Ames, and the effort certainly paid off.
Ron Paul's fifth place finish, despite a minimal effort to participate in the event, and a court challenge in the way the way the vote was held (he looks good now considering the technical issues of the night) that should have hurt him more, show that he is not a fringe candidate. Even though he is not near the top-tier, his message (and dedicated supporters) should not be dismissed. Paul's following reminds me of Howard Dean from four years ago; if a top candidate can get Paul's endorsement, there is a major grass roots organization that will follow.
I am waiting for the announcements from Tommy Thompson and Duncan Hunter that they are suspending their campaigns. Thompson said many times that if he didn't finish near the top, he was done; and considering how hard his campaign worked to do well in this event, the sixth place finish will assure that we will now have only one Thompson remain in the race. John Cox? At least his family and friends voted for him.
We knew that McCain was going to have a poor showing, but he actually received more votes than he did in 1999. Also, there may be something to Fred Thompson doing better than Rudy Giuliani, but it may be because a group paid $10,000 to be at the event, pass out material on Thompson's behalf, and broadcast audio of his speeches over a speaker. All three candidates who weren't here know who the competition now is, and need to get in position to do better in the Iowa caucus in January.
Tomorrow, Romney (FOX), Huckabee (CBS) and Brownback (ABC) will be on the Sunday news/talk shows...so tune in to see how they spin the results.
So how did I do? Here's my prediction again for you to compare:
- Mitt Romney - 36%
- Mike Huckabee - 19%
- Tommy Thompson - 11%
- Rudy Giuliani - 8%
- Fred Thompson - 7%
- Tom Tancred - 6%
- Sam Brownback - 5%
- Ron Paul - 5%
- Duncan Hunter - 2%
- John McCain - 1%
- John Cox - 0%
Hey...I got the top two, and bottom three, correct...not too bad. As for everything in between, I blame it on Diebold. ;-)
-RSKnopfJr
Recent Comments